The magician's fallicy

So Atheism is the stupidest religion ever. So the Atheist point in life is to prove the unprovable. That there is no God. No creator. No pure goodness. No reason to live and no reason to die.  Science rules!
The only goodness is that which you decide is good. No ten rules to guide your life.
Any thought of God is just a fairy-tale. Yes a fairy-tale. I have another fairy-tale I would like to tell.
A big explosion happens, No we don't know why this explosion happened but we are sure no sentient being had nothing to do with it. It slang a perfectly round sphere in a perfect proximity to a star which it must have created too. The star was the perfect size and temperature by accident.
After a while a substance fell from the sky into water. Which by no means but pure coincidence it got mixed up and created a being. That being became some sort of fish. The fish grew legs and went to land. The thing that was a fish and grew legs through pure chance changed in to what is now humans which took a very long time. They lived happy ever after then they died.
In my mind all those coincidences are so unlikely. I don't think the odds are even calculable. This is a simplified version of the "science" and all these things happen without any origin force. It started all by itself. Atheist believe that even if someone started this it could not be God because it does not match the ones in religion stories.
The religion stories. Goes God created everything in seven days out of nothing. He did this with his power which was never referred to as magic. 
I call this article the magician's fallacy because of Penn of Penn and Teller. I respect him greatly. His thinking about politics align with mine quite well. When he starts talking about religion, to me he sounds quite foolish. I think you could consider either of these stories fairy tales. Magic goo falls from the sky after an explosion shake and stir. A million or two years later boom man. The other says seven days and boom man.
What is the difference between the two stories? The "God one" has a beginning. The goo one has no beginning and if it does it discounts the being because it don't fit the model they want. If I have to choose on I would choose the God one. Not just because it has a beginning but because it has a center. It has kindness and a future.
How could God create everything in seven days? We have evidence that it took way longer.  Well if you read the bible, you read later that a day can be a thousand years and a thousand days a year. What would time be to God.
Science has no kindness. No beginning. No forever.   No happy ending. So even if both of these stories are really fairy-tales? Which would be better for human kind to follow?  There are rules or the rules are what you think they should be or there is a beginning and something after the end? We should be kind to each other. Or the strongest should survive? Science just has no answers just more questions. With religion you really don't need all the answers.
My hope is that you pick the right color pill and don't get stuck with magic.